Email link to boys’ popularity

News story

Surveyed boys who used email at home were brighter and more popular than boys who did not – according to a recent study by an educational psychologist from Curtin University.

Genevieve Johnson says most online applications are good for children's development.

The study* by School of Education Senior Lecturer Genevieve Johnson analysed responses by 51 boys and 44 girls at a Canadian primary school.

Dr Johnson likened the situation of boys who did not use email to that of boys from a generation or two before who did not watch TV.

“Think back to when you were a little kid if one of your friends didn’t have a lunch box with the latest cartoon characters on it – because they didn’t watch TV – they were almost socially isolated because they didn’t know what was going on,” Dr Johnson told Curtin News.

“So when we say that children who use the internet under certain circumstances are more popular – that’s true.”

The girls surveyed by Dr Johnson were more likely than the boys to use email at home, but at school the girls and boys reported very similar use.

The similarity between boys’ and girls’ email use suggested internet teaching at school may be closing the technology gender gap.

It was considered likely that the gap was closing not because of decreased use by boys, but because of greater use by girls.

Dr Johnson has completed many studies on how communications technologies affect the development of children.

She said that throughout history parents and teachers had always been wary of how children would be affected by new technologies.

“We’ve got this impression that the internet, including internet games, is something bad,” she told Curtin News.

“This is totally inconsistent with the vast majority of my research.

“I cannot say that every single online application is associated with positive developmental outcomes – but most are.”

Dr Johnson said the same conclusion was broadly applicable to other communications technologies.

“Any technology is going to have advantages and disadvantages in terms of children’s development,” she said.

“To immediately assume that technologies like texting, like the internet, like video games, are a bad thing for children is so naive.

“There’s much more evidence to suggest that technology can be quite a good thing for children.”

PHOTOGRAPHY: SAM PROCTOR

* Internet Activities and Developmental Predictors: Gender Differences Among Digital Natives, Genevieve Marie Johnson, Journal of Interactive Learning, Volume 10, Number 2, Summer 2011.

Comments

Share your thoughts on this story (comments are moderated in advance).

This story has 2 comments

  1. Paul Griffin says:

    Whilst the study is quite possibly a very valuable one, it is surprising that, with such a very limited number of survey respondents – presumably only one or two classes of a Canadian primary school – it is considered of sufficient importance to dominate the front page of the Curtin website for any period of time.

    Does this highlighting of such an apparently minor piece of research assist in positioning Curtin at the forefront of research institutions in the world?

    • andrew williams says:

      Because they got nothing to post up on the web site

Your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *